Legal Opinion

Colson v. Pelgram

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

The Supreme Court of this State, as successor to the Courts of Chancery, has inherent jurisdiction over testamentary trusts. Where, however, as here, there is a surviving trustee, the trust itself is not vested in the Supreme Court. There has been a growing disposition on the part of the Supreme Court not to in any manner interfere with Surrogates’ Courts where such court has taken actual jurisdiction and has ample power to dispose of a matter involved in a decedent’s estate. (Matter of Smith, 120 App. Div. 199; Lawrence v. Littlefield, 215 N. Y. 561; Evans v. Appell, 211 App. Div. 105;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . LittlefieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Evans v. AppellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. In re the Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Colson v. PelgramAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Colson v. FlemingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API