Legal Opinion
State v. Holland
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 29, 1988No. C4-87-1336PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Richard Edward Holland appeals from a conviction of felony criminal damage to property, Minn.Stat. § 609.595 (1986), and misdemeanor convictions of obstructing legal process, Minn.Stat. § 609.50 (1986), driving after cancellation, Minn.Stat. § 171.24 (1986), and unsafe equipment, Minn.Stat. § 169.47 (1986), following a bifurcated jury trial, and from the disposi-tional departure sentence of one year and a day executed on the felony conviction and concurrent terms of 90 days for each of the misdemeanor convictions. We affirm as modified.
FACTS
On the evening of April 8,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- State v. WiplingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ButcherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. ReimerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. WorthyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997