Legal Opinion

Hill v. Lewis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1918PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Josephine: Frank M. Calkins, Judge. On motion of respondent to dismiss appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Benson

1. Plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal of the defendant Bose Cheshire for the following reasons: The decree of the trial court was made and entered on September 4, 1917. Thereafter, on September 7,1917, the defendant Bose Cheshire served and filed her notice of appeal and on September 17,1917, served and filed her undertaking on appeal. The appeal having been perfected, she neglected- to file a transcript within thirty days thereafter *240and subsequently on October 24,1917, filed a second notice of appeal which was followed on November 2,1917, with service and filing of a new undertaking and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schmeer v. SchmeerOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  2. State v. KeeneyOregon Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RosserOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. McKinney v. NaybergerOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Wheeler v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. East Standard Mining Co. v. DevineNevada Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Ogden v. HoffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API