Legal Opinion
Semsroth v. City of Wichita
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 28, 2008No. Civil Action 06-2376-KHVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge.
Greta Semsroth, Kim Warehime and Sara Voyles bring suit against the City of Wichita, Kansas alleging retaliation on the basis of sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. 1 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 84) filed January 11, 2008. For reasons stated below, the Court sustains the motion.
Legal Standards
Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Semsroth v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Couch v. MikesellDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
- Sims v. University of Maryland Medical System CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Straws v. SpencerDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Turner v. Wyandotte County, Kansas, Unified Government ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020