Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Kenney

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1845PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the First District, Buchanan, J. •

1Opinion of the CourtBullaed, J.

The plaintiffs represent that they are the heirs at law of Barney Coffey, who died in the year 1836, leaving a testament, which has been admitted to probate, containing legacies to Sarah French, alias Coffey, of one-third part of his estate, and to his two children by said Sarah French, to wit, John and Ann, each of one-third. That said legacies are void, because the deceased Barney Coffey was not married to Sarah French at the time the will was executed, but that she had a lawful husband living at the time, to the knowledge of said Barney, to wit, one Peter Haney, from whom she eloped many…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Prall v. Peet's CuratorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  2. O'Donogan v. KnoxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1837
  3. Edrington v. TêteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gaines v. HennenSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. Teutonia Loan & Building Co. v. ConnollySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  3. Wilson v. MarshallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
  4. Gaines v. HennenSupreme Court of the United States · 1861

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API