Legal Opinion
Di Laura v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided January 18, 1939No. Claim No. 25315PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
This claim was filed to recover damages sustained by claimants because of leakage from the Barge Canal into the Medina sandstone quarry of which they were lessees. The period covered by the claim is from March 28, 1938, to the date of filing, September 28, 1938.
The question of liability of the State in respect to this particular quarry was litigated many years ago. Since then many successive claims based on a six months’ period of continuing damage have been adjusted by the Claims Bureau of the State pursuant to the provisions of the Canal Law and upon an agreement of settlement and proof…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Edlux Construction Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Edlux Construction Corporation v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Dufel v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Paduano v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Mayright v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1925
3Cited by12 opinions
- Taylor v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Waterman v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Allen v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1955
- Moltion v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
- Acme Builders, Inc. v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.