Commonwealth v. York
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
This case involves an appeal from the judgment of sentence for possession with intent to deliver cocaine and hashish, in violation of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act (35 P.S. Section 780-101 et seq.), by the appellant, Oscar Herbert York. We affirm.
The evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict-winner, reveals that in the middle of August, 1986, State Narcotics Agent Robert M. Roderick received information from one Robert Baldwin “regarding a purchase that he felt he would be able to make” for a pound of cocaine from the appellant.
Baldwin…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FromalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. AgnewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. MarconiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. KnottsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.