Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 12, 1934No. 25201PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
This is an appeal by R. H. Hudson, the plaintiff, from a judgment of (he district court of Oklahoma county in favor of the Oklahoma Tax Commission and others, the defendants.
The facts were presented by stipulation. The plaintiff filed his state income tax return for the year 1931, in which he stated the items and amount of his income and the items and amount of the credits claimed. Among other credits claimed was the item in question in this case, an item of $2,137, which was the amount of loss sustained by the sale of 100 shares of stock of Phillips Petroleum Company. The plaintiff acquired…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burnet v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. FlannerySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- McCaughn v. LudingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Finerty v. First Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Integrity Mutual Casualty Co. v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Essley v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Dickinson v. JamesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938