Legal Opinion

Smith v. Cumberland School Committee

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 3, 1980No. 79-22-AppealPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORIS, Justice.

The United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island has certified to this court two questions of law that require us to decide whether a school committee or the Department of Mental Health, Retardation and Hospitals (MHRH) must bear the cost of providing special education for handicapped children.

The facts underlying this litigation are not in dispute. Thomas Smith, a twelve-year-old multihandicapped child, and his parents reside in Cumberland, Rhode Island. Due to Thomas’s physical and emotional handicaps, the regular programs offered in the Cumberland…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berthiaume v. SCHOOL COM. OF CITY OF WOONSOCKETSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  2. Loughran v. FlandersDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1979
  3. In Re DoeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  4. Naughton v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  5. Roe v. AffleckSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thomas F. Smith, Jr. v. Cumberland School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  3. Hurry Ex Rel. Hurry v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983
  4. Anthony Voccio and Domenic Voccio v. Reliance Insurance Companies, Anthony Voccio and Domenic Voccio v. Reliance Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  5. Carroll Ex Rel. Carroll v. CapalboDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API