Legal Opinion

Blackmar v. Lichtenstein

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided March 30, 1979No. 76-685PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

468 F.Supp. 370 (1979)

Charles B. BLACKMAR, Plaintiff,

v.

David B. LICHTENSTEIN et al., Defendants.

No. 76-685.

United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

March 30, 1979.

Albert H. Hamel, William I. Rutherford, Mark D. Mittleman, John Gianoulakis, Carroll J. Donohue, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

Robert S. Allen, Harold C. Gaebe, Jr., Armstrong, Teasdale, Kramer & Vaughan, St. Louis, Mo., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

NANGLE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court following a hearing held on January 15, 1979. Said hearing resulted from a remand of this cause by the United States Court of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. ByrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Nedd v. United Mine Workers Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  3. Curb & Gutter Dist. No. 37 of Fayetteville v. ParrishCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  4. Hamilton Trust Co. v. Cornucopia Mines Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  5. Blackmar v. LichtensteinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blackmar v. LichtensteinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  2. Corbin v. BlankenburgCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Knox v. LichtensteinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. Flinchbaugh v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Blackmar v. LichtensteinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API