Legal Opinion

Mase v. Wetzel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 30, 1932No. 30880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

Plaintiffs are the heirs of one Joe Tooms and bring this suit to be recognized as owners of certain property of which defendants are in possession and of which they claim the ownership through mesne conveyances going back to a sheriff’s sale to one Hipp Marx, of date March 14, 1914, made in a certain proceeding entitled Hipp Marx v. Succ. of Joe Tooms.

Their claim is that said sale was made under a writ of fieri facias issued against a succession upon an ordinary judgment against said succession, and is therefore null and void.

The simple record facts, appearing on the face of the petition ánd…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Succession of KeppelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. McCalop v. Fluker's HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
  3. Randolph v. Widow & Heirs of ChapmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cannella v. Succession of CannellaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API