Legal Opinion

Marriage of Reinke v. Reinke

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1990No. C9-90-1648Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Donna Mae Reinke appeals the trial court’s judgment automatically reducing permanent spousal maintenance in two years and denying her attorney fees. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand,

FACTS

Donna and respondent Martin Friedrich Reinke were married on December 21, 1956. Donna, although previously employed at approximately $6 to $7 per hour, has not worked outside of the home for the past four years. She has been babysitting, however, which provides a small amount of income, and she is currently training to become a foster parent. The trial court found that Donna’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. In Re the Marriage of DuBois v. DuBoisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API