Legal Opinion

In Re Pettibone Corp.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 9, 1993No. 19-05403PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION OF RICHARD & LORETTA BURSCH TO ALLOW POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST AS PART OF THEIR ALLOWED CLAIM (in the Policy Year 1980-81)

JACK B. SCHMETTERER, Bankruptcy Judge.

In this proceeding under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Pettibone Corporation and its related companies reorganized. Their Plan was confirmed on December 9, 1988. The Court retained jurisdiction to determine any claims disputes that arose under the Plan in that case. The instant issue relates to one of those disputes.

The Products Liability (“PL”) Trustee moved to allow the claim of PL claimants Richard…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Gladys E. Shondel, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Bursch v. Beardsley & PiperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. In Re LembkeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1988
  4. Pettibone Corp. v. Ramirez (In Re Pettibone Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  5. Official Creditors' Committee of Products Liability & Personal Injury v. International Insurance Co. (In Re Pettibone Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Pettibone Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  2. In Re Pettibone Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  3. Hamel v. Malden Mills Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API