Legal Opinion

Ecklund v. Continental Casualty Co.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided August 25, 2005No. CV-02-S-2357 NEPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SMITH, District Judge.

Plaintiff Charlotte Eeklund, a former employee of Computer Sciences Corporation (“CSC”), 1 filed this action under sections 1132(a)(1)(B) and (a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiff claims that she was wrongfully-denied long-term disability benefits pursuant to her employer’s group, long-term, disability insurance policy. The policy was underwritten by defendant, Continental Casualty Company, an entity that conducts business as CNA (“CNA” or “defendant”). The action now is before the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Stanley Haves, Marjorie Haves, His Wife v. City of Miami, a Municipal Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Acree v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2013
  2. Creel v. Wachovia Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API