Legal Opinion

Casey v. International Harvester Co. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1934Published

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, with ten dollars costs to the appellant against the State Industrial Board. Claimant’s attorney is a party in interest who may appeal under section 23 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (See Rawlings v. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Kentucky, 187 Ky. 308; 218 S. W. 985; Schilling v. Industrial Accident Commission of California, 47 Cal. App. 190; 190 Pac. 373.) McNamee, Bliss and Heflernan, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and Rhodes, J., dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schilling v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Rawlings v. Workmen's Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920