Schilling v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING in Certiorari to review an order of the Industrial Accident Commission fixing compensation of counsel for legal services rendered to an applicant. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner instituted this proceeding in certiorari to review the. order of the Industrial Accident Commission fixing his compensation, after rehearing, for legal services rendered to an applicant for compensatiou under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Insurance and Safety Act.
[1] It appears from the record that the applicant, having been injured while in the course of his employment, consulted petitioner, who is an attorney at law, and through his advice and counsel procured temporary compensation from the insurance carrier; that thereafter he obtained other employment,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Bryant v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Bentley v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Reich, Adell, Crost & Perry v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Bryant v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.