Legal Opinion
Adams v. Napa Cantina Wineries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 1, 1938No. 8365PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
Appeal has been taken from an order which affirmed a special master’s report and' allowed a claim, filed by appellant against appellee as a debtor under section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. §. 207 and note, “as recommended” by the special master. The latter recommended that the claim “be allowed as a priority claim in the sum of $400.00, and be disallowed as to all amounts in excess” thereof.
Although the record before us is inadequate, there are, we believe, sufficient facts before us when obtained piecemeal from various reports and documents.
Appellee is a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Gugel v. New Orleans Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
- Smith v. Mortgage & Debenture Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900
- Bradley v. Lehigh Valley R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Oahu Cabinets, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1981
- West Hills Memorial Park v. DonecaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Peir v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Peir v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938