Legal Opinion

Pergament v. Loring Properties, Ltd.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 2, 1999No. CX-98-1031PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Justice.

We are asked to determine when the mortgage exception to the merger doctrine prevents an easement from being extinguished. We conclude that at the time fee title to the dominant estate is united with fee title to the servient estate, the easement is extinguished with this exception: a mortgagee of the dominant estate will be entitled to the benefit of the easement should the mortgagee’s interest become possessory.

In this case, respondent, Brian A. Per-gament, brought an action in district court seeking declaratory judgment that he was *148entitled to an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. State Farm Insurance Companies v. SeefeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Burnquist v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. TapperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Duval v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. LambrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Cowan v. CarnevaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Bolen v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Luther T. Collins v. Metro Real Estate Services, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Ford Consumer Finance Co. v. Carlson & Breese, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API