Legal Opinion

United States v. Lloyd Baldwin

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 12, 2005No. 03-3721PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SYKES, Circuit Judge.

Lloyd Baldwin was convicted of four counts of wire fraud for his involvement in a phony “prime bank funding program” that successfully separated Joe Piscopo from $3 million of his money. Baldwin’s first contention on appeal is that one count of the indictment was returned one day after the statute of limitations on that offense had expired. No one noticed this at the time, although the parties now agree that Count 1 was untimely. Because the statute of limitations argument was never raised in the district court, our review is for'plain error. Baldwin’s sentence on Count 1…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. Thomas S. Ross and John ColloriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Travis RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Franco-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Thaddeus BaniaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API