Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Woodward v. Tynan

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 30, 1985No. 83-1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion on Rehearing En Banc

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

We granted rehearing en banc because this case appeared to raise important questions under the Supremacy and Full Faith and Credit Clauses of the United States Constitution. It is established doctrine, however, that federal courts should avoid “unseemly conflict between two sovereign-ties, the unnecessary impairment of state functions, and the premature determination of constitutional questions.” Martin v. Creasy, 360 U.S. 219, 224, 79 S.Ct. 1034, 1037, 3 L.Ed.2d 1186 (1959). Upon reflection, we believe the problems inherent in the instant case…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. CreasySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. United States v. Interstate Dress Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  3. Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. RamDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1950
  4. Karlsson v. WolfsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1956
  5. Application of Bendix Aviation CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. A. Farber & Partners Inc. v. GarberDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
  2. Rodriguez v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. In re Zyprexa Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
  4. United States v. TynanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. Camiolo v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API