Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Williams

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1988No. 614PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This appeal is from the judgment of sentence for receiving stolen property. Appellant contends that the suppression court erred in denying his motion to suppress physical evidence. We agree and, accordingly, vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial.

Appellant was arrested and charged with burglary, theft, receiving stolen property, and criminal and defiant trespass. Prior to trial, appellant moved to suppress a video cassette recorder (“VCR”) and tapes that he had placed on a bench in a bar, and that had been seized by a police officer. The motion was denied,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. James Andrew Colbert and Michael Beryl ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. HolzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. ShoatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. QuilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. DanforthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. AriondoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. McBrideSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. KohlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API