Legal Opinion

Meinzer v. Buhl 66 C & B Warehouse Distributing, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 8, 1998No. C0-98-423PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

In challenging the denial of reemployment insurance benefits, relator Lori L. Meinzer contends she did not commit misconduct and was denied a fair hearing when the reemployment insurance judge engaged in ex parte communication with the employer’s representative. We reverse and remand.

PACTS

Buhl 66 discharged Meinzer for allegedly failing to' follow store policy and stealing merchandise. Meinzer filed a claim for reemployment insurance benefits, which initially was granted on the basis that she had been discharged for reasons other than misconduct. Buhl 66 appealed. At…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moes v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Enterprise Communications, Inc. v. Department of Employment Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Minnesota Nurses Association v. McLeod County, Relator, Public Employment Relations Board, ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API