Legal Opinion

Lohja v. Checker Taxi Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 30, 1980No. 80-297PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

On September 18, 1978, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed for failure to comply with discovery rules and orders. Four months later, plaintiff sought to vacate the dismissal pursuant to a section 72 petition (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 110, par. 72) which alleged that during part of the period of noncompliance, he was experiencing a neurological disorder and “did not recall” receiving notices of several of the discovery orders. The trial court granted plaintiffs petition to reinstate the cause. The only question presented for review is whether this petition was properly allowed. For the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Esczuk v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Danforth v. Checker Taxi Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  3. Fennema v. Vander AaIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Sanchez v. PhillipsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. M.L.C. Corp. v. PallasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harris v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Gayton v. LeviAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Vaughn v. Northwestern Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Ameritech Publishing of Illinois, Inc. v. HadyehAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Nehring v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API