Legal Opinion
Arum v. Miller
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 8, 2004No. 00-CV-7476 (DRH) (ETB)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
The various Defendants who are either a Nassau County agency or employees of that agency (“Nassau County Defendants”) have filed a motion for summary judgment and for judgment on the pleadings. The Court exercises its discretion to treat the entire motion as a motion for summary judgment and, for the following reasons, grants the motion in part and denies the motion in part.
I. BACKGROUND.
In evaluating a summary judgment motion, the Court “is required to draw all factual inferences in favor of, and take all factual assertions in the light most favorable…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Graham v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Lozada v. WeilminsterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Davis v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Forsyth v. Federation Employment And Guidance ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Forsyth v. Federation Employment & Guidance ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.