Legal Opinion

Jim Arnold Corporation v. Hydrotech Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 22, 1997No. 95-1335Published

1Opinion of the Court

109 F.3d 1567

42 U.S.P.Q.2d 1119

JIM ARNOLD CORPORATION, Earl E. Ennis, and James F. Arnold,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

HYDROTECH SYSTEMS, INC., Arkla, Inc., Diversified Energies,

Inc., Minnegasco, Inc., Baker Hughes, Incorporated, Hughes

Tool Company, Mohr Corp., Harvey O. Mohr, H.O. Mohr Research

& Engineering, Inc., H.O. Mohr & Associates, Inc., Cal Dive

International, Inc., Robert Wittman, H.S.I. Acquisition,

Inc., Lee R. Larkin and Andrews & Kurth, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 95-1335, 95-1432.

United States Court of Appeals,

Federal Circuit.

March 21, 1997.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for

Rehearing In…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API