Legal Opinion
Bergner v. Derr
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided August 14, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00593Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-593-RGJ JAMIE BERGNER Plaintiff v. ABIGAIL DERR Defendants AND A&J SALES * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Abigail Derr moves to dismiss Plaintiff Jamie Bergner’s Complaint. [DE 10]. Bergner moves for leave to file her Second Amended Complaint1. [DE 21]. Briefing is complete and the matter is ripe. [DE 16; DE 20; DE 22; DE 23]. For the reasons below, Derr’s Motion to Dismiss [DE 10] is DENIED AS MOOT and Bergner’s Motion for Leave to Amend [DE 21] is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Roth Steel Products, and Toledo Steel Tube Company, Cross-Appellants v. Sharon Steel Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Brian Midkiff Monica Midkiff v. Adams County Regional Water DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.