Legal Opinion

Keister v. McDavid

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1950No. 970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Judge.

Keister and Kaden were sued for wages for carpenter work. The claim was for less than $500 and under the rules of the trial court answers were not required. Ka-den filed a cross-complaint against Keister, claiming damages of $3,000 for Keister’s failure to complete a construction contract in connection with which plaintiffs’ work was performed. Keister filed no answer to the cross-complaint although required to do so by rule of court; but no effort was made to take a default against him. The case was several times set for trial 'but was continued by consent of the parties. It was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Banville v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stansel v. American Security BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Ewing v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. In re L.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Hollywood Credit Clothing Co. v. HamdonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. In Re LHDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API