Legal Opinion

Stacey v. Taliaferro

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 21, 1932No. 3 Div. 957PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

By agreement of the parties five suits pending on the equity docket were consolidated and submitted in the circuit court as one case, which was disposed of by a single decree from which ten of the parties jointly prosecute this appeal, and the case was submitted here on a joint assignment of errors, without severance in the assignment of errors.

The rule is well settled that where errors are jointly assigned injury must be shown to all parties joining in the assignment to sustain it. Cook et al. v. Atkins, 173 Ala. 363, 56 So. 224; Alabama Penny Savings Bank v. Holmes, 184 Ala. 469, 63 So.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wells v. American Mortgage Co. of Scotland, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Chavers v. MayoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Hall v. First BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Cook v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Pettit v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bank of Cottonwood v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co. v. WigleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Henslee v. HensleeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Hammock v. OakleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Bowden v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API