Legal Opinion

Abramowitz v. 145 East 16th Street LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered January 12, 2007, which granted plaintiff’s motion for a Yellowstone injunction, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances presented, it was a proper exercise of discretion to grant plaintiff residential tenant Yellowstone relief despite the availability of RPAPL 753 (4) (see Post v 120 E. End Ave. Corp., 62 NY2d 19, 28 [1984]; see e.g. Stolz v 111 Tenants Corp., 3 AD3d 421 [2004]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley and Catterson, JJ.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Post v. 120 East End Avenue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Stolz v. 111 Tenants Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004