Legal Opinion

Stolz v. 111 Tenants Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*422Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered April 15, 2003, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for a Yellowstone injunction enjoining defendant landlord from taking action to terminate their proprietary lease and tolling the time to cure the default alleged in the notice to cure dated August 15, 2002, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and plaintiffs’ motion granted.

Under the terms of the notice to cure served by defendant on plaintiffs, plaintiffs had the option of either allowing defendant access to the residential premises in order to remove a greenhouse…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Post v. 120 East End Avenue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Wilen v. Harridge House AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Caldwell v. 302 Convent Avenue Housing Development Fund Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Kanter v. East 62nd Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 259 West 12th, LLC v. GrossbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Sinsheimer v. Park & 66th Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  3. Abramowitz v. 145 East 16th Street LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API