Legal Opinion

California Federal Bank v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 16, 1999No. 92-138 CPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HODGES, Judge.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the United States breached its contracts with certain financial institutions when it enacted the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA), United States v. Winstar Corporation, 518 U.S. 839, 116 S.Ct. 2432, 135 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996). FIRREA eliminated the use of a special accounting treatment for banks’ acquisitions of failing thrifts. Therefore, the law of this case is that the Government broke its promise to California Federal Bank (Cal Fed) that it could count “supervisory goodwill” as capital and amortize it…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Harvey Ward Locke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. Northern Helex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. California Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Energy Capital Corp. (As General Partner of Energy Capital Partners Limited Partnership) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  3. California Federal Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. LaSalle Talman Bank, F.S.B. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. Coast Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API