Canadian Mining Co. v. Creekmore
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
J. Seaboen Holt, Associate Justice.
Appellees, L. B. Creekmore and wife and Claude J. Pierce and wife, filed separate actions against appellant mining company on separate lease contracts on their respective interest in a fifty acre tract of land in Oklahoma.. The interest of the Creekmore’s was a one-eighth interest and that of the Pierce’s a one-sixteenth interest. The Creekmores sought to recover $637, plus $1 a day from November 4, 1955 until judgment, alleged to be due under the terms of the lease contract and the Pierces sought a similar amount under their lease. The trial court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Eastern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Larabee Flour Mills Co. v. CarignanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- McAlester v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Southern Motor Supply Co. v. Shelburne Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shel-Al Corporation v. American National Insurance Company and Exchange Security BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Chaffin v. RamseyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Chisholm v. ReitlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Johnson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
- Chaffin v. RamseyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.