Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Bloomingdale
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided November 26, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
This application involves the entry of a decree on remittiturs of the Court of Appeals in a proceeding for the construction of the will. (Matter of Bloomingdale, 278 N. Y. 435.) Allowances by way of counsel fees, pursuant to section 278 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, are requested by Max D. Steuer, as attorney for Donald Bloomingdale and Rosalie Banner Bloomingdale, beneficiaries of the estate, and by Richmond J. Reese and Alexander J. Lindsay, attorneys for Mr. Reese as executor.
In the exercise of the discretion of the surrogate and pursuant to the terms of section 278 of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In re the Estate of PottsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Randall v. . PackardNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Collins v. Central Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Final Account of Proceedings of LesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- In re the Estate of SielckenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Estate of EstricherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952
- In re the Estate of HellerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- In re the Accounting of KroossNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
- In re the Estate of AlcottNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- Atwood v. KerlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.