Tate v. Fletcher
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C. C.
Warren Tate obtained a judgment of foreclosure in a suit against Wright & Hamlin and others-~In that suit Fletcher & Churchman were co-defendants, as the holders of a junior mortgage, the lien of which was next to the lien of Tate’s mortgage. Wright & Hamli n filed a complaint for a review of Tate’s judgment, and made Fletcher & Churchman and others defendants. In this suit for review, Fletcher & Churchman filed a cross complaint duly verified, averring that the note secured by Tate’s mortgage, after its execution, and without the knowledge or consent of its makers, had been…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sherman v. ShermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
- Woodward v. MathewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lilly v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Spencer v. TripplettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Tennant v. HuletIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Wright v. ChurchmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Ft. Wayne Trust Co. v. SihlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.