K-MART CORPORATION v. Butler
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This case involves claims based on negligence and on misrepresentation. At trial, at the close of all the evidence, appellant/defendant K-Mart made a motion for a directed verdict on the grounds that plaintiffs' evidence was insufficient to establish K-Mart's negligence and was insufficient to establish the alleged misrepresentation. The trial court denied the motion and sent the case to the jury on both counts. The jury returned a verdict against K-Mart, and the trial court entered judgment thereon. Without making any post-trial motions, K-Mart appealed to this Court.
On appeal, K-Mart argues…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc. v. SealySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- McDonald's Corp. v. GrissomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- RAST CONST., INC. v. PetersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Spiers v. FlowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Hysmith v. GrimesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Lambert Construction Co. v. ArdenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987