Legal Opinion

K-MART CORPORATION v. Butler

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 28, 1986No. 84-1041PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case involves claims based on negligence and on misrepresentation. At trial, at the close of all the evidence, appellant/defendant K-Mart made a motion for a directed verdict on the grounds that plaintiffs' evidence was insufficient to establish K-Mart's negligence and was insufficient to establish the alleged misrepresentation. The trial court denied the motion and sent the case to the jury on both counts. The jury returned a verdict against K-Mart, and the trial court entered judgment thereon. Without making any post-trial motions, K-Mart appealed to this Court.

On appeal, K-Mart argues…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc. v. SealySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. McDonald's Corp. v. GrissomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. RAST CONST., INC. v. PetersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Spiers v. FlowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Hysmith v. GrimesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. Lambert Construction Co. v. ArdenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API