Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Health Care Manor Care

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 9, 2000No. 3:98 CV 7765Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KATZ, District Judge.

This action is before the Court on Plaintiffs objections to the February 3, 2000 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate. In accordance with Hill v. Duriron Co., 656 F.2d 1208 (6th Cir.1981), and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) & (C), this Court has made a de novo determination of the Magistrate’s findings to which the Plaintiff objects. For the following reasons, the Court finds Plaintiffs objections are not well taken and the same are denied.

Background

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this employment discrimination action under Title VII…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Edward E. Westlake v. William Lucas, Sheriff of Wayne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  5. Donald and Ronald HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the DURIRON COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API