Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mertsaris v. 73rd Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 1984Published

1Concurrence

Titone, J. P.

(concurring). The question of whether plaintiffs established a prima facie case is, in my view, an extremely close one. For one thing, the disagreement of the experts as to the initial choice of a resuscitatory method would not, in and of itself, establish a departure from accepted medical standards. “There is no authority that a doctor * * * must use what some doctors consider the best method if a method which is accepted by respectable medical authority is adopted” (Gielskie v State of New York, 10 AD2d 471,474, affd 9 NY2d 834; see, also, Henry v *89Bronx Lebanon Med. Center, 53…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mduba v. Benedictine HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Grewe v. Mount Clemens General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Wilson v. StilwillMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Monahan v. WeichertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Dries v. GregorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API