Legal Opinion

Monahan v. Weichert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1981No. Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCHNEPP, J.

In this medical malpractice case we consider primarily the problem of distinguishing the effect of the defendant Dr. Harold R. Weichert’s alleged negligence from the natural results of plaintiff William F. Monahan’s disease. Trial Term dismissed the complaint against Dr. Weichert at the end of the plaintiff’s case concluding that there was insufficient evidence to permit the inference of proximate cause, i.e., any causal connection between defendant doctor’s conduct and plaintiff’s injury. We reverse and grant a new trial. The proof of proximate cause…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Toth v. Community HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Howard v. LecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Dunham v. Village of CanisteoNew York Court of Appeals · 1952

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Aegis Insurance Services, Inc. v. 7 World Trade Center Company, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Lipsius v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Mack v. Altmans Stage Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Barnes v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. Berk v. St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API