Legal Opinion

Seinfeld v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 25, 2006No. 624, 2005PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice.

The plaintiff-appellant, Frank D. Seinfeld (“Seinfeld”), brought suit under section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law to compel the defendant-appellee, Verizon Communications, Inc. (“Verizon”), to produce, for his inspection, its books and records related to the compensation of Verizon’s three highest corporate officers from 2000 to 2002. Seinfeld claimed that their executive compensation, individually and collectively, was excessive and wasteful. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the Court of Chancery applied well-established Delaware law and held that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  2. Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  3. Malone v. BrincatSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  4. Grimes v. DonaldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  5. White v. PanicSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Bank v. Yahoo! Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
  2. Schoon v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  3. Central Laborers Pension Fund v. News Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  4. West Coast Management & Capital, LLC v. Carrier Access Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
  5. Pershing Square v. Ceridian CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API