Legal Opinion

Lampp v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 10, 1996No. 94-03496Published

1Per curiam

The appellant, Wallace Calvin Lampp, challenges the trial court’s judgment and sentence. After a review of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the appellant’s conviction without discussion. However, we find that the trial court erred in imposing certain costs and a probation condition.

*1106The appellant pled not guilty to the charge of grand theft, in violation of section 812.014(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1993). After the jury found him guilty as charged, the trial court adjudicated him guilty, stayed, and withheld the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Sutton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Bourque v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Malone v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Sandefur v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API