Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Angell Elevator Lock Co. Inc. v. Manning

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

The plaintiff (Angell) seeks, among other things, to enjoin Thomas Manning and his son Robert from making and selling an unpatented elevator lubricator similar to that made by Angell. Upon the basis of a confirmed master’s report, the final decree (a) enjoined the Mannings “from manufacturing ... or selling . . . products patterned from or similar in appearance to . . . [Angell’s] lubricator,” and (b) ordered them to pay to Angell $6,000 as damages plus interest and costs. The facts are stated as found by the master.

Thomas Manning entered the employ of a sole proprietorship, a predecessor of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Flagg Manufacturing Co. v. HolwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. New England Overall Co. Inc. v. WoltmannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  5. New Method Die & Cut-Out Co. v. Milton Bradley Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Blazon, Inc. v. DeLuxe Game Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  3. Clairol, Inc. v. Cody's Cosmetics, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. McKernan v. BurekDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
  5. Oxford Global Resources, LLC v. Jeremy HernandezMassachusetts Superior Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API