Charleston Urban Renewal Authority v. Courtland Co.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STARCHER, Justice:
In the instant case, the Courtland Company (“Courtland”) challenges the authority of the Charleston Urban Redevelopment Authority (“CURA”) to exercise the power of eminent domain to acquire land (“the Court-land Property”) that is owned by Courtland and is located in downtown Charleston.
CURA wants to acquire and develop the Courtland Property as part of a unified business district, pursuant to the provisions of CURA’s redevelopment plan for the downtown Charleston area. The Courtland Property is presently being used as a privately owned commercial parking lot and is wholly…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Public Citizen, Inc. v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- State Ex Rel. West Virginia Housing Development Fund v. CopenhaverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
- Chapman v. Huntington, West Virginia, Housing AuthorityWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aposporos v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Mountain Valley Pipeline v. Brian C. and Doris W. McCurdyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
- Potomac Edison Co. v. Jefferson County Planning & Zoning CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Mountain Valley Pipeline v. Brian C. and Doris W. McCurdyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
- Mountain Valley Pipeline v. Brian C. and Doris W. McCurdyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.