Commonwealth v. Williams
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
SPAETH, President Judge,
concurring:
Although I agree with the result reached by the majority, and with much of its opinion, my reasoning is somewhat different.
The common law doctrine of merger was developed before and independently of double jeopardy principles. The Fifth Amendment double jeopardy provision was first applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment in Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784, 89 S.Ct. 2056, 23 L.Ed.2d 707 (1969). The equivalent Pennsylvania provision did not apply to non-capital offenses. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Baker, 413 Pa. 105, 196 A.2d 382 (1964);…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Moszczynski v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.