Legal Opinion

Hannah Bros. v. OSK Marketing & Communications, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 24, 2009No. 1:09-cv-00654-RJHPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD J. HOLWELL, District Judge.

The question in this maritime attachment proceeding is whether the plaintiff may effectively pierce the corporate veil of a contractual counterparty by alleging that the defendants entered into an unwritten “maritime joint venture.” Since the complaint here does not plausibly allege the existence of such a joint venture, the Court rejects plaintiffs novel theory of enterprise liability and vacates its prior attachment orders. In addition, the Court grants in part and denies in part a request for attorneys’ fees, interest, and…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Simmons v. WareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Dongguan Guankun Trading Co., Ltd., et al. v. The Estate of Billy Chen, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
  3. Platina Bulk Carriers Pte Ltd. v. Praxis Energy Agents DMCCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API