Legal Opinion
Kleemann v. Sheridan
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1953No. 5652PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHELPS, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Maricopa County in favor of defendant-appellee and against plaintiff-appellant.
The facts are that appellant Florence A. Kleemann and Fannie E. Sheridan were sisters; that on May 9, 1932, appellant and Mrs. Sheridan rented a safety deposit box from the Valley National Bank and jointly signed a contract of lease with the bank which' insofar as material to the instant
case, provides:
“ * * * It is hereby declared that all property of every kind at any time heretofore or hereafter placed in said box is the joint property of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strout v. BurgessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
- Young v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Greenwood v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Matthew v. MoncriefCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Edmonds v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brant v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Lonergan v. StromCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- In Re Estate of EstelleArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Miller v. RieglerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Richard H. Black, Deceased, Phyllis M. Black, Personal Representative v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.