Legal Opinion

Rimmer v. Sanchez

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided September 18, 2025No. 5:22-cv-04058Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION MALIK RIMMER, Plaintiff, No. C22-4058-LTS vs. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER NATHAN SANCHEZ, et al., Defendants. ___________________________ This matter is before me on defendants’ motion (Doc. 30) to dismiss. Plaintiff Malik Rimmer filed a pro se resistance (Doc. 31) and defendants filed a reply (Doc. 32). Oral argument is not necessary. See L.R. 7(c). I. BACKGROUND On October 26, 2022, Rimmer filed a pro se civil rights complaint (Doc. 1-1) and a motion (Doc. 1) to proceed in forma pauperis. His complaint…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API