Legal Opinion
Brua v. Olson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 16, 2001No. C3-00-1082PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s application of the two-year statute of limitations provision in the Civil Damages Act to his contribution and indemnity claim.
FACTS
On February 4, 1997, Travis Brua, James Nichols, and appellant Jason Breck-el drove snowmobiles to respondent Ticket Bar a/k/a Hen House where, despite being under 21 years of age, they were served alcohol. Soon after leaving the bar, Brua fell off his snowmobile and was struck by appellant’s snowmobile. On April 3, 1997, appellant served a “notice of injury” on respondent bar in compliance with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Calder v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Lee v. ArrowoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- In Re Estate of BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hubbard v. ChidelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Brink v. Smith Companies Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. a & a Liquors of St. CloudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Wollan v. JahnzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003