Legal Opinion

Remer v. Fox

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 5, 1948No. Docket 147/696PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This suit concerns a written contract to buy and sell premises 33 Washington Street, Mount Holly, New Jersey. Complainant is the vendor therein, the defendant Melvin J. Fox is the vendee, and the defendant William H. Absalom is the real estate broker who negotiated the sale. The complainant prays rescission and cancellation of the contract; the defendant Melvin J. Fox, by way of counter-claim, seeks specific performance of the agreement; and the defendant William H. Absalom seeks exoneration of the charges of fraud and misrepresentation — of double-dealing, upon which the complainant bases…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Riehl v. RiehlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  2. Trust Co. of Orange v. GarfinkelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  3. Young v. HughesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1880
  4. Ledirk Amusement Co., Inc. v. SchechnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  5. Ledirk Amusement Co., Inc. v. SchechnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mango v. Pierce-CoombsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  2. Thompson Realty Co. v. HoaglandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API