Legal Opinion

In re Zadan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

On May 13, 1991, the respondent was convicted, upon his *66guilty plea, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, of submission of a false document in violation of 18 USC § 1001, a felony.

We have previously held that 18 USC § 1001 is essentially similar to New York Penal Law § 175.35, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, a class E felony. (Matter of Krup, 136 AD2d 351; Matter of Mydanick, 78 AD2d 339, lv denied 53 NY2d 604).

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re MydanickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. In re KrupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re ZumboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API