In re Zadan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
On May 13, 1991, the respondent was convicted, upon his *66guilty plea, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, of submission of a false document in violation of 18 USC § 1001, a felony.
We have previously held that 18 USC § 1001 is essentially similar to New York Penal Law § 175.35, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, a class E felony. (Matter of Krup, 136 AD2d 351; Matter of Mydanick, 78 AD2d 339, lv denied 53 NY2d 604).
Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In re MydanickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re KrupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
4Cited by1 opinion
- In re ZumboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993