Legal Opinion

Gairing v. McClelland

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1945No. Docket No. 83, Calendar No. 43,067PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiffs filed a bill of interpleader in which, in substance, they allege that either as stakeholders or as debtors on a demand note they are obligated to pay the sum of $6,500; that the defendant McClelland and the defendant Wright, as administrator of the estate of Frank H. McKeyes, deceased, are rival claimants to this fund which plaintiffs are obligated and willing to pay. Defendant McClel-land moved to dismiss the bill of complaint as to him. This motion was heard by the trial judge. Later he filed a memorandum' and decree in which he held the motion should be granted. Subsequently by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. School District No. 1 v. WestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Sprague v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Michigan Trust Co. v. McNamaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Moore v. BarnheiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Detroit Bank v. BradfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. J G Wentworth Ssc Lp v. Anthony MorrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. J G Wentworth Ssc Lp v. Anthony MorrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API